PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBAX vs. FLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBAX vs. FLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBAX vs. FLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
6.46%20.21%2.50%5.60%-4.80%5.53%8.02%18.66%-9.65%
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
3.14%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-10.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than FLAX's 3.14% return.


BBAX

1D
2.53%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.42%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*

FLAX

1D
3.31%
1M
-9.20%
YTD
3.14%
6M
7.81%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBAX vs. FLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBAX and FLAX have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BBAX vs. FLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAX
BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBAX vs. FLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBAXFLAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.73

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.39

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.57

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.34

10.05

-0.71

BBAX vs. FLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAX and FLAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBAXFLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.73

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.20

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.31

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between BBAX and FLAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BBAX vs. FLAX - Dividend Comparison

BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than FLAX's 2.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
3.72%3.86%4.13%4.17%5.06%5.47%2.57%4.07%1.36%
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
2.30%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%

Drawdowns

BBAX vs. FLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum FLAX drawdown of -42.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and FLAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBAXFLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-42.51%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-12.99%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.33%

-39.07%

+14.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.71%

-10.12%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-15.70%

+8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.32%

-0.47%

Volatility

BBAX vs. FLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) is 7.10%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that BBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBAXFLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

9.89%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

14.21%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

19.67%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

18.55%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

19.75%

0.00%