BBAX vs. GMF
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF).
BBAX and GMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. GMF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. Both BBAX and GMF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBAX or GMF.
Key characteristics
| BBAX | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.66% | 3.83% |
| 1Y Return | -0.50% | 10.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.63% | -5.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.39% | 2.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.10 | 0.68 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.17% | 14.11% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.64% | -67.18% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.54% | -22.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBAX and GMF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBAX vs. GMF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than GMF's 3.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBAX vs. GMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GMF's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBAX vs. GMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBAX vs. GMF - Dividend Comparison
BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than GMF's 2.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 4.42% | 4.17% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 2.38% | 4.07% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 1.55% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
BBAX vs. GMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum GMF drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and GMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBAX vs. GMF - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) at 3.95%. This indicates that BBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.