BATT vs. EHY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) and EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BATT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EHY.

Performance

BATT vs. EHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than EHY's -38.15% return.

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

EHY

• 1D: -6.90%
• 1M: -26.11%
• YTD: -38.15%
• 6M: -36.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATT vs. EHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	5.12%
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-38.15%	-25.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BATT and EHY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

BATT vs. EHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATT vs. EHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATT	EHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATT	EHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-1.21	+1.22

Drawdowns

BATT vs. EHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than EHY's maximum drawdown of -54.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and EHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATT	EHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-54.05%	-15.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-54.05%	+50.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.78%	-33.13%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BATT	EHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.80%	58.36%	-27.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.57%	58.36%	-28.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.60%	58.36%	-27.76%

BATT vs. EHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EHY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BATT vs. EHY - Dividend Comparison

BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EHY's 48.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	48.29%	8.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATT and EHY in my portfolio?

BATT and EHY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BATT or EHY?

On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BATT or EHY?

BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BATT or EHY?

EHY has the higher dividend yield at 48.29%, compared with 1.47% for BATT.

What is the main difference between BATT and EHY?

BATT is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while EHY is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BATT and 0.75% for EHY.