BATT vs. EHY
BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) and EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify, while EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BATT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EHY.
Performance
BATT vs. EHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than EHY's -37.94% return.
BATT
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 53.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- -1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.43%
EHY
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 10.30%
- 6M
- -24.02%
- YTD
- -37.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $654.74K | $762.69K | $1.26M | |
| $59.83K | $37.88K | $74.04K |
BATT vs. EHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 8.33% | 4.72% |
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -37.94% | -25.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and EHY is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. EHY — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BATT vs. EHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BATT | EHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BATT vs. EHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than EHY's maximum drawdown of -61.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and EHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | EHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -61.70% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.08% | -53.90% | +36.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -37.79% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility
BATT vs. EHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | EHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.77% | 59.61% | -25.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 59.61% | -29.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 59.61% | -28.82% |
BATT vs. EHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EHY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATT vs. EHY - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than EHY's 60.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.71% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 60.58% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT and EHY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 60.58%, compared with 1.71% for BATT.
BATT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while EHY is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BATT and 0.75% for EHY.
Find the right allocation for BATT and EHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer