BATT vs. BITY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BATT returned 103.56% vs -37.35% for BITY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BATT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.

Performance

BATT vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -23.09% return.

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

BITY

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -19.63%
• YTD: -23.09%
• 6M: -26.69%
• 1Y: -37.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATT vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	69.53%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-23.09%	-8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BATT and BITY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

BATT vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATT vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATT	BITY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	-0.94	+4.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	-1.30	+4.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	0.85	+0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.12	-0.81	+6.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.20	-1.41	+23.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATT vs. BITY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATT Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the BITY Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATT and BITY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATT	BITY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38	-0.94	+4.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-0.70	+0.71

Drawdowns

BATT vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than BITY's maximum drawdown of -46.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and BITY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATT	BITY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-46.36%	-23.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.03%	-46.36%	+29.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-45.49%	+42.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.78%	-19.67%	-15.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	26.48%	-21.80%

Volatility

BATT vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) at 9.68%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATT	BITY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.29%	9.68%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.67%	31.24%	-6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.80%	39.94%	-9.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.57%	39.02%	-9.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.60%	39.02%	-8.42%

BATT vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BATT vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than BITY's 39.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	39.66%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATT and BITY in my portfolio?

BATT and BITY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BATT or BITY?

BATT has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to BITY (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs BITY's -46.36%.

Which ETF is better, BATT or BITY?

On 1-year performance, BATT leads with 103.56% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BITY has been the lower-risk option at 9.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BATT or BITY?

Over the 1-year period, BATT has performed better with a 103.56% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BATT or BITY?

BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BATT or BITY?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 1.47% for BATT.

What is the main difference between BATT and BITY?

BATT is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BATT and 0.65% for BITY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.