BATL vs. TPET

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BATL (Battalion Oil Corporation) and TPET (Trio Petroleum Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 3 years, BATL returned -43.73%/yr vs -29.44%/yr for TPET. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

BATL vs. TPET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATL achieves a 28.32% return, which is significantly higher than TPET's -64.61% return.

BATL

• 1D: 5.84%
• 1M: 9.85%
• 6M: -61.94%
• YTD: 28.32%
• 1Y: 14.17%
• 3Y*: -43.73%
• 5Y*: -35.42%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.76%

TPET

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -6.95%
• 6M: -61.33%
• YTD: -64.61%
• 1Y: -76.16%
• 3Y*: -29.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -49.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BATL Battalion Oil Corporation	$20.81M	$35.82M	$27.20M
TPET Trio Petroleum Corp.	$782.50K	$1.36M	$1.32M

BATL vs. TPET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BATL Battalion Oil Corporation	28.32%	-34.30%	-82.10%	22.58%
TPET Trio Petroleum Corp.	-64.61%	-34.38%	290.45%	-88.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BATL and TPET is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.24

Over the past year, BATL and TPET have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap BATL : $24.21M TPET : $2.93M
EPS BATL : -$3.02 TPET : -$0.41
PS Ratio BATL : 0.16 TPET : 6.42
PB Ratio BATL : 0.16 TPET : 0.23
Total Revenue (TTM) BATL : $156.88M TPET : $695.09K
Gross Profit (TTM) BATL : $24.18M TPET : $113.32K
EBITDA (TTM) BATL : $44.32M TPET : -$6.12M

Return for Risk

BATL vs. TPET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BATL

BATL Risk / Return Rank: 65
BATL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BATL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BATL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BATL Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BATL Martin Ratio Rank: 48

TPET

TPET Risk / Return Rank: 28
TPET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TPET Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TPET Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TPET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TPET Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BATL vs. TPET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BATL	TPET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	-0.33	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	0.51	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.07	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	-0.88	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.22	-1.41	+1.62

BATL vs. TPET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATL Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the TPET Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATL and TPET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BATL vs. TPET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATL drawdown since its inception was -95.81%, roughly equal to the maximum TPET drawdown of -96.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATL and TPET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATL	TPET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.81%	-96.87%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.81%	-86.29%	-9.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.81%	-89.95%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.76%	-89.44%	-5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.12%	-70.46%	+10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	57.10%	53.76%	+3.34%

Volatility

BATL vs. TPET - Volatility Comparison

Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) has a higher volatility of 49.00% compared to Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET) at 24.99%. This indicates that BATL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATL	TPET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	49.00%	24.99%	+24.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	192.68%	178.47%	+14.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	319.13%	232.70%	+86.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	177.15%	1,070.70%	-893.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	233.01%	1,070.70%	-837.69%

Dividends

BATL vs. TPET - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATL nor TPET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATL and TPET in my portfolio?

BATL and TPET have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BATL or TPET?

BATL has higher volatility (49.00%) compared to TPET (24.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATL dropped -95.81% vs TPET's -96.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.