BATL vs. RMCO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and Royalty Management Holding Corporation (RMCO).

Performance

BATL vs. RMCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and Royalty Management Holding Corporation (RMCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BATL vs. RMCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BATL Battalion Oil Corporation	245.13%	-34.30%	-82.10%	56.26%
RMCO Royalty Management Holding Corporation	-3.78%	210.86%	-41.29%	-82.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BATL : $64.18M RMCO : $44.49M
EPS BATL : $0.72 RMCO : -$0.05
PS Ratio BATL : 0.39 RMCO : 8.97
Total Revenue (TTM) BATL : $164.96M RMCO : $4.95M
Gross Profit (TTM) BATL : $120.16M RMCO : $804.78K
EBITDA (TTM) BATL : $99.76M RMCO : -$271.19K

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATL achieves a 245.13% return, which is significantly higher than RMCO's -3.78% return.

BATL

• 1D: -28.83%
• 1M: -29.35%
• YTD: 245.13%
• 6M: 222.31%
• 1Y: 200.00%
• 3Y*: -15.96%
• 5Y*: -20.04%
• 10Y*: —

RMCO

• 1D: 22.35%
• 1M: -22.17%
• YTD: -3.78%
• 6M: 40.35%
• 1Y: 168.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BATL vs. RMCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATL

BATL Risk / Return Rank: 83
BATL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BATL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BATL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BATL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BATL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

RMCO

RMCO Risk / Return Rank: 85
RMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
RMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
RMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATL vs. RMCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and Royalty Management Holding Corporation (RMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATL	RMCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.55	-0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	2.28	+1.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.33	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	3.44	-1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.18	9.00	-4.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATL vs. RMCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATL Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the RMCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATL and RMCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATL	RMCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	1.55	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.36	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BATL and RMCO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BATL vs. RMCO - Dividend Comparison

BATL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

	TTM	2025
BATL Battalion Oil Corporation	0.00%	0.00%
RMCO Royalty Management Holding Corporation	0.34%	0.24%

Drawdowns

BATL vs. RMCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATL drawdown since its inception was -95.23%, roughly equal to the maximum RMCO drawdown of -92.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATL and RMCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATL	RMCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.23%	-92.35%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.91%	-49.13%	-36.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.91%	-69.97%	-15.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.47%	-81.92%	+23.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.41%	18.77%	+29.64%

Volatility

BATL vs. RMCO - Volatility Comparison

Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) has a higher volatility of 130.15% compared to Royalty Management Holding Corporation (RMCO) at 44.42%. This indicates that BATL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATL	RMCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	130.15%	44.42%	+85.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	204.91%	95.10%	+109.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	311.14%	109.47%	+201.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	171.23%	110.39%	+60.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.72%	110.39%	+57.33%

Financials