PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPET vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPET vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPET achieves a -62.93% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 17.68% return.


TPET

1D
-1.90%
1M
-19.61%
YTD
-62.93%
6M
-64.54%
1Y
-82.99%
3Y*
-30.59%
5Y*
10Y*

XOM

1D
0.91%
1M
-9.81%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.59%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
21.08%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPET vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TPET
Trio Petroleum Corp.
-62.93%-34.38%290.45%-88.31%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
17.68%15.98%11.26%-10.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TPET and XOM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.20

The correlation between TPET and XOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPET:

$8.26M

XOM:

$584.49B

EPS

TPET:

-$0.47

XOM:

$5.93

PS Ratio

TPET:

5.89

XOM:

1.83

PB Ratio

TPET:

0.24

XOM:

2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPET:

$695.09K

XOM:

$326.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPET:

$113.32K

XOM:

$83.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPET:

-$6.12M

XOM:

$60.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPET vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPET
TPET Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TPET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPET Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TPET Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPET Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPET vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPETXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

1.53

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.74

4.55

-6.29

TPET vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPET Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPET and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPET vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPET drawdown since its inception was -96.87%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPET and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPETXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.87%

-62.40%

-34.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.28%

-19.08%

-66.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.09%

-19.08%

-76.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.94%

-17.96%

-70.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.85%

-10.21%

-59.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.33%

6.42%

+47.91%

Volatility

TPET vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET) has a higher volatility of 29.87% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 8.03%. This indicates that TPET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPETXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.87%

8.03%

+21.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

178.01%

20.78%

+157.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

233.48%

24.86%

+208.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,088.57%

26.70%

+1,061.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,088.57%

28.24%

+1,060.33%

Dividends

TPET vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

TPET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPET
Trio Petroleum Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.92%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

TPET vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trio Petroleum Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
208.26K
83.16B
(TPET) Total Revenue
(XOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TPET and XOM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPET has higher volatility (29.87%) compared to XOM (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPET dropped -96.87% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPET and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer