BATL vs. EONR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and EON Resources Inc (EONR).

Performance

BATL vs. EONR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and EON Resources Inc (EONR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BATL vs. EONR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BATL Battalion Oil Corporation	245.13%	-34.30%	-82.10%	-1.03%	-50.41%
EONR EON Resources Inc	116.09%	-53.15%	-59.52%	-80.21%	1.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BATL : $64.18M EONR : $45.62M
EPS BATL : $0.72 EONR : $0.07
PE Ratio BATL : 5.40 EONR : 12.08
PS Ratio BATL : 0.39 EONR : 1.86
Total Revenue (TTM) BATL : $164.96M EONR : $17.31M
Gross Profit (TTM) BATL : $120.16M EONR : $13.81M
EBITDA (TTM) BATL : $99.76M EONR : $16.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATL achieves a 245.13% return, which is significantly higher than EONR's 116.09% return.

BATL

• 1D: -28.83%
• 1M: -29.35%
• YTD: 245.13%
• 6M: 222.31%
• 1Y: 200.00%
• 3Y*: -15.96%
• 5Y*: -20.04%
• 10Y*: —

EONR

• 1D: -18.63%
• 1M: 92.13%
• YTD: 116.09%
• 6M: 70.19%
• 1Y: 72.52%
• 3Y*: -57.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BATL vs. EONR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATL

BATL Risk / Return Rank: 83
BATL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BATL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BATL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BATL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BATL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

EONR

EONR Risk / Return Rank: 66
EONR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EONR Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EONR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EONR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EONR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATL vs. EONR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and EON Resources Inc (EONR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATL	EONR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	0.59	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	1.78	+2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.18	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.18	2.03	+2.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATL vs. EONR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATL Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the EONR Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATL and EONR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATL	EONR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	0.59	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.33	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between BATL and EONR is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BATL vs. EONR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATL nor EONR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BATL vs. EONR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATL drawdown since its inception was -95.23%, roughly equal to the maximum EONR drawdown of -97.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATL and EONR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATL	EONR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.23%	-97.73%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.91%	-52.17%	-33.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.91%	-93.15%	+7.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.47%	-53.98%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.41%	30.29%	+18.12%

Volatility

BATL vs. EONR - Volatility Comparison

Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) has a higher volatility of 130.15% compared to EON Resources Inc (EONR) at 74.83%. This indicates that BATL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EONR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATL	EONR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	130.15%	74.83%	+55.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	204.91%	98.84%	+106.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	311.14%	123.84%	+187.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	171.23%	142.58%	+28.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.72%	142.58%	+25.14%

Financials