BATAX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BATAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 21, 2015. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BATAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio | 0.59% | 7.37% | 7.34% | 6.43% | -5.87% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 6.76% | 2.20% | 5.21% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATAX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BATAX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 3.68%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
BATAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.68%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BATAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BATAX
FASGX
BATAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 1.41 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.36 | 2.01 | +4.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 1.30 | +0.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 2.00 | +3.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.28 | 8.74 | +12.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.41 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.57 | 0.55 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.21 | 0.71 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.60 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between BATAX and FASGX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BATAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BATAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio | 5.38% | 5.92% | 5.45% | 3.91% | 3.14% | 1.82% | 3.22% | 4.73% | 5.36% | 4.10% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BATAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATAX drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATAX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.42% | -47.35% | +29.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.15% | -9.07% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.12% | -23.54% | +15.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.42% | -27.20% | +9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -5.77% | +5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -6.74% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 2.07% | -1.77% |
Volatility
BATAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) is 0.43%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that BATAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 5.30% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 8.12% | -6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12% | 13.00% | -10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 12.18% | -10.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 12.58% | -9.51% |