BAR vs. GDX
BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds - BAR tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) while GDX tracks the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAR returned 18.41%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for GDX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAR charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
BAR vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAR achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return.
BAR
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
BAR vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 2.94% | 64.12% | 26.97% | 12.96% | -0.55% | -3.92% | 25.02% | 18.16% | -1.87% | -1.15% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | -5.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAR and GDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BAR and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAR vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
BAR
GDX
BAR vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAR | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 2.00 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 5.13 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAR | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.52 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.13 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
BAR vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAR | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -80.34% | +58.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -30.84% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -30.84% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.91% | -46.51% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | -26.62% | +8.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -40.43% | +33.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 11.99% | -4.27% |
Volatility
BAR vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is 5.46%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that BAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAR | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 15.40% | -9.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.03% | 37.50% | -14.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 45.49% | -19.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 36.39% | -18.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 37.18% | -20.80% |
BAR vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAR vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAR and GDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to BAR (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAR dropped -21.53% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 18.69% vs 18.41% for BAR. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 18.69% return vs 18.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
BAR tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for BAR and 0.51% for GDX.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAR and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer