PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAR vs. DGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAR vs. DGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAR vs. DGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
8.57%64.12%26.97%12.96%-0.55%-3.92%25.02%18.16%-1.87%-1.15%
DGZ
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes
-9.08%-32.55%-16.46%-4.75%4.93%1.53%-20.80%-13.42%4.88%1.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAR achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than DGZ's -9.08% return.


BAR

1D
3.76%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.20%
1Y
49.58%
3Y*
33.22%
5Y*
21.84%
10Y*

DGZ

1D
0.81%
1M
11.14%
YTD
-9.08%
6M
-16.77%
1Y
-28.38%
3Y*
-19.40%
5Y*
-13.91%
10Y*
-9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAR vs. DGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DGZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAR vs. DGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAR
BAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DGZ
DGZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAR vs. DGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BARDGZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

-0.59

+2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

-0.65

+2.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.92

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

-0.69

+3.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.99

-1.31

+11.30

BAR vs. DGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the DGZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAR and DGZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BARDGZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

-0.59

+2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

-0.50

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

-0.38

+1.35

Correlation

The correlation between BAR and DGZ is -0.68. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

BAR vs. DGZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAR nor DGZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BAR vs. DGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum DGZ drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and DGZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BARDGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-86.32%

+64.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.19%

-41.53%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.91%

-61.54%

+40.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.22%

-84.42%

+71.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-57.48%

+51.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

21.88%

-16.69%

Volatility

BAR vs. DGZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is 11.01%, while DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that BAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BARDGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

16.64%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.13%

43.96%

-19.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.63%

48.50%

-20.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

28.23%

-10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

23.03%

-6.73%