BAMY vs. TUGN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) and TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMY returned 10.01% vs 31.29% for TUGN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMY charges 1.48%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TUGN.

Performance

BAMY vs. TUGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMY achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than TUGN's 15.79% return.

BAMY

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 10.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TUGN

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 15.79%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 31.29%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMY vs. TUGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.41%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	15.79%	19.11%	18.44%	12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMY and TUGN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.74

The correlation between BAMY and TUGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAMY vs. TUGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 81
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

TUGN

TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 55
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMY vs. TUGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMY	TUGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.87	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.48	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.34	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	2.43	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.10	8.24	+9.85

BAMY vs. TUGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the TUGN Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMY and TUGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMY vs. TUGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMY drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, smaller than the maximum TUGN drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMY and TUGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMY	TUGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-23.45%	+17.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-12.96%	+10.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-3.27%	+3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-6.38%	+5.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	3.80%	-3.25%

Volatility

BAMY vs. TUGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) is 0.93%, while STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a volatility of 8.01%. This indicates that BAMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMY	TUGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	8.01%	-7.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.84%	13.65%	-10.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.57%	16.81%	-12.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.99%	17.32%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.99%	17.32%	-11.33%

BAMY vs. TUGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMY has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than TUGN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMY vs. TUGN - Dividend Comparison

BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, less than TUGN's 10.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.57%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%	0.00%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	10.82%	11.50%	11.84%	10.83%	7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMY and TUGN in my portfolio?

BAMY and TUGN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMY or TUGN?

TUGN has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to BAMY (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMY dropped -6.03% vs TUGN's -23.45%.

Which ETF is better, BAMY or TUGN?

On 1-year performance, TUGN leads with 31.29% vs 10.01% for BAMY. On fees, TUGN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BAMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMY or TUGN?

Over the 1-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMY or TUGN?

TUGN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMY or TUGN?

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 7.57% for BAMY.

What is the main difference between BAMY and TUGN?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and STF. Their fees differ too: 1.48% for BAMY and 0.65% for TUGN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.