PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMY vs. IVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMY vs. IVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMY vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
-0.46%12.93%10.60%5.20%
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
-8.16%21.95%35.82%9.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMY achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than IVW's -8.16% return.


BAMY

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
2.71%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVW

1D
4.05%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-8.16%
6M
-6.12%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMY vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMY has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMY vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMY
BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IVW
IVW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMY vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMYIVWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

1.01

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

1.57

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.22

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.65

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.03

6.48

+8.55

BAMY vs. IVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the IVW Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMY and IVW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMYIVWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.01

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

0.41

+1.44

Correlation

The correlation between BAMY and IVW is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BAMY vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison

BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than IVW's 0.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
8.04%7.16%8.20%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.43%0.40%0.43%1.03%0.92%0.46%0.82%1.63%1.28%1.30%1.51%1.51%

Drawdowns

BAMY vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMY drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, smaller than the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMY and IVW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMYIVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-57.33%

+51.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-13.75%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-10.26%

+8.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-17.73%

+17.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

3.51%

-2.67%

Volatility

BAMY vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) is 2.00%, while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that BAMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMYIVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

7.14%

-5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

12.61%

-9.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.77%

22.25%

-15.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

21.12%

-14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

20.54%

-14.38%