PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMY vs. HYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMY vs. HYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BAMY having a 1.37% return and HYS slightly higher at 1.42%.


BAMY

1D
0.09%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.37%
6M
2.25%
1Y
11.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYS

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.14%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMY vs. HYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
1.37%12.93%10.60%5.20%
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.42%8.80%8.42%5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMY and HYS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.64

The correlation between BAMY and HYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMY vs. HYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BAMY
HYS

Technology

40.4%

-

Communication Services

13.0%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%

-

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Financial Services

6.8%

-

Industrials

6.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Energy

1.5%

-

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Technology

BAMY
40.4%
HYS

-

Communication Services

BAMY
13.0%
HYS
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BAMY
12.6%
HYS

-

Healthcare

BAMY
8.7%
HYS

-

Financial Services

BAMY
6.8%
HYS

-

Industrials

BAMY
6.6%
HYS

-

Consumer Defensive

BAMY
5.3%
HYS

-

Utilities

BAMY
2.5%
HYS

-

Basic Materials

BAMY
1.5%
HYS

-

Energy

BAMY
1.5%
HYS

-

Real Estate

BAMY
1.3%
HYS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMY vs. HYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMY
BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMY vs. HYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMYHYSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.12

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

3.28

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.89

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.59

15.89

+4.69

BAMY vs. HYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the HYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMY and HYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMYHYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.12

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

0.82

+1.07

Drawdowns

BAMY vs. HYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMY drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, smaller than the maximum HYS drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMY and HYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMYHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-20.91%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-1.88%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.05%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-1.53%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.46%

+0.09%

Volatility

BAMY vs. HYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) is 1.11%, while PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that BAMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMYHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.25%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.75%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.61%

3.47%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

6.26%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.03%

6.85%

-0.82%

BAMY vs. HYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMY has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HYS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAMY vs. HYS - Dividend Comparison

BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than HYS's 7.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
7.57%7.16%8.20%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.35%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMY and HYS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYS has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to BAMY (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMY dropped -6.03% vs HYS's -20.91%.

On 1-year performance, BAMY leads with 11.21% vs 7.32% for HYS. On fees, HYS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, BAMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAMY has performed better with a 11.21% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 7.35% for HYS.

BAMY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while HYS is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.48% for BAMY and 0.56% for HYS.

BAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMY and HYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer