PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMY vs. FDAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMY vs. FDAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMY vs. FDAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
-0.46%12.93%10.60%5.20%
FDAT
Tactical Advantage ETF
0.92%7.50%9.90%6.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMY achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than FDAT's 0.92% return.


BAMY

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
2.71%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDAT

1D
0.41%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.87%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMY vs. FDAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMY has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FDAT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMY vs. FDAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMY
BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FDAT
FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMY vs. FDAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMYFDATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

0.83

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

1.17

+1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.16

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.53

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.03

4.08

+10.95

BAMY vs. FDAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the FDAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMY and FDAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMYFDATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

0.83

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

0.88

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between BAMY and FDAT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BAMY vs. FDAT - Dividend Comparison

BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than FDAT's 5.77% yield.


TTM202520242023
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
8.04%7.16%8.20%1.96%
FDAT
Tactical Advantage ETF
5.77%4.77%8.99%1.58%

Drawdowns

BAMY vs. FDAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMY drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, smaller than the maximum FDAT drawdown of -8.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMY and FDAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMYFDATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-8.20%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-5.88%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-4.43%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-2.20%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.22%

-1.38%

Volatility

BAMY vs. FDAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) is 2.00%, while Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that BAMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMYFDATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

2.12%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

8.12%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.77%

10.34%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

9.50%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

9.50%

-3.34%