BAMO vs. MFUL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL).

BAMO and MFUL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMO is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023. MFUL is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021.

Performance

BAMO vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAMO vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	-2.42%	9.16%	14.39%	7.75%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	-0.53%	4.51%	5.36%	3.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMO achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than MFUL's -0.53% return.

BAMO

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 9.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -0.53%
• 6M: -0.41%
• 1Y: 3.24%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMO vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

BAMO

Brookstone Opportunities ETF

MFUL

Mindful Conservative ETF

Return for Risk

BAMO vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 54
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 35
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMO	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.69	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	0.94	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.14	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	0.94	+0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	3.33	+3.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMO vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMO and MFUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMO	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.69	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	-0.20	+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between BAMO and MFUL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BAMO vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than MFUL's 3.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.58%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%	0.00%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.13%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMO	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-16.41%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-3.77%	-3.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-4.13%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-9.80%	+8.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	1.06%	+0.49%

Volatility

BAMO vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.89%. This indicates that BAMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMO	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	1.89%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.10%	3.10%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.80%	4.75%	+6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.72%	4.22%	+5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.72%	4.22%	+5.50%