BAMO vs. HIDE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMO (Brookstone Opportunities ETF) and HIDE (Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMO returned 14.18% vs 10.85% for HIDE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMO charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HIDE.

Performance

BAMO vs. HIDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMO achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than HIDE's 6.79% return.

BAMO

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 14.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIDE

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMO vs. HIDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	5.83%	9.16%	14.39%	7.75%
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF	6.79%	5.32%	-0.85%	1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMO and HIDE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.27

The correlation between BAMO and HIDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BAMO vs. HIDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMO	HIDE
Technology	29.2%	-
Financial Services	17.1%	-
Industrials	11.4%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	-
Healthcare	10.4%	-
Communication Services	7.8%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.3%	0.1%
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	99.2%

Return for Risk

BAMO vs. HIDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

HIDE

HIDE Risk / Return Rank: 81
HIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. HIDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMO	HIDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.46	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.46	-0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.50	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	4.72	-2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	19.36	-7.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMO vs. HIDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the HIDE Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMO and HIDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMO	HIDE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.46	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	0.91	+0.58

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. HIDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, which is greater than HIDE's maximum drawdown of -5.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and HIDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMO	HIDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-5.15%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-2.31%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-1.73%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-0.94%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.56%	+0.61%

Volatility

BAMO vs. HIDE - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) at 1.45%. This indicates that BAMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMO	HIDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	1.45%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.45%	3.92%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.35%	4.43%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.57%	4.25%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.57%	4.25%	+5.32%

BAMO vs. HIDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDE's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMO vs. HIDE - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than HIDE's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.46%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%	0.00%
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF	2.96%	3.16%	2.86%	3.90%	6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMO and HIDE in my portfolio?

BAMO and HIDE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMO or HIDE?

BAMO has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to HIDE (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMO dropped -12.72% vs HIDE's -5.15%.

Which ETF is better, BAMO or HIDE?

On 1-year performance, BAMO leads with 14.18% vs 10.85% for HIDE. On fees, HIDE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HIDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMO or HIDE?

Over the 1-year period, BAMO has performed better with a 14.18% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMO or HIDE?

HIDE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMO or HIDE?

HIDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.46% for BAMO.

What is the main difference between BAMO and HIDE?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BAMO and 0.29% for HIDE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.