PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMO vs. GAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMO vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMO vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMO
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
-2.42%9.16%14.39%7.75%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.89%18.76%6.67%6.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMO achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 3.89% return.


BAMO

1D
1.57%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-2.42%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GAA

1D
1.44%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
3.89%
6M
8.34%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
7.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMO vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMO vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO
BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMOGAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

1.90

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

2.55

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.86

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.44

11.75

-5.31

BAMO vs. GAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMO and GAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMOGAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

1.90

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.60

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between BAMO and GAA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BAMO vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than GAA's 3.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMO
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
1.58%1.54%1.58%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.78%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum GAA drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and GAA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMOGAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

-26.57%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-7.18%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-4.27%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-3.90%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.75%

-0.20%

Volatility

BAMO vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) is 3.04%, while Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that BAMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMOGAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.33%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

7.20%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

10.33%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.72%

11.27%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.72%

11.05%

-1.33%