BAMG vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMG returned 24.36% vs 17.57% for TDVG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

BAMG vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 8.04% return.

BAMG

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 24.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMG vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	8.87%	17.03%	24.01%	11.91%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.04%	14.80%	13.45%	10.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and TDVG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.75

The correlation between BAMG and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMG vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMG	TDVG
Technology	41.8%	26.2%
Healthcare	11.8%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.8%	1.0%
Financial Services	9.5%	19.3%
Industrials	9.0%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	7.2%
Utilities	1.7%	3.8%
Basic Materials	0.7%	2.8%
Energy	0.5%	5.3%
Real Estate	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

BAMG vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 46
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 56
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMG vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMG	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.81	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.60	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.44	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	10.01	-2.80

BAMG vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMG and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMG	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-19.20%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	-7.24%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-0.82%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-3.73%	+1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	1.76%	+1.63%

Volatility

BAMG vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.78%. This indicates that BAMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMG	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	2.78%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.13%	7.61%	+4.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.34%	9.79%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	13.92%	+3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	13.90%	+3.28%

BAMG vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMG vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMG and TDVG in my portfolio?

BAMG and TDVG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMG or TDVG?

BAMG has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to TDVG (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMG dropped -21.00% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, BAMG or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, BAMG leads with 24.36% vs 17.57% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMG or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, BAMG has performed better with a 24.36% return vs 17.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMG or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMG or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.

What is the main difference between BAMG and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.