PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMG vs. PWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMG vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMG vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
-9.00%17.03%24.01%11.91%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
-0.93%24.94%31.04%15.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's -0.93% return.


BAMG

1D
3.10%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
-9.00%
6M
-4.14%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PWB

1D
3.98%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
0.41%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMG vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMG vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMG
BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMG vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMGPWBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

1.35

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.92

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.59

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.21

10.04

-5.83

BAMG vs. PWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMG and PWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMGPWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.35

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.55

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and PWB is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BAMG vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAMG nor PWB has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%1.24%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum PWB drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and PWB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMGPWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.00%

-52.58%

+31.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-12.11%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-8.61%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-8.29%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.12%

+0.39%

Volatility

BAMG vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is 5.48%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that BAMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMGPWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

7.98%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

15.16%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

23.23%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

20.96%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

20.58%

-3.47%