BAMG vs. BBHL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BAMG is actively managed, while BBHL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BBHL.

Performance

BAMG vs. BBHL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than BBHL's 5.40% return.

BAMG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHL

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMG vs. BBHL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	10.74%	3.23%
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	5.40%	2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and BBHL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

BAMG vs. BBHL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 53
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMG vs. BBHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMG	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMG	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.26	+0.19

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. BBHL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, which is greater than BBHL's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and BBHL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMG	BBHL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-11.99%	-9.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.53%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-3.01%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMG	BBHL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	12.70%	+1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	12.70%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	12.70%	+4.27%

BAMG vs. BBHL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHL's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMG vs. BBHL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAMG nor BBHL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMG and BBHL in my portfolio?

BAMG and BBHL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMG or BBHL?

On fees, BBHL is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMG or BBHL?

BBHL is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMG or BBHL?

BAMG and BBHL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BAMG and BBHL?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.71% for BBHL.