BAMD vs. BAMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) and BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMD returned 7.69% vs 2.78% for BAMB. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMB.

Performance

BAMD vs. BAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than BAMB's -0.85% return.

BAMD

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 7.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. BAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	8.13%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.85%	6.15%	3.01%	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and BAMB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.21

BAMD vs. BAMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMD	BAMB
Financial Services	26.8%	98.5%
Energy	15.6%	-
Technology	13.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	12.8%	-
Utilities	12.6%	-
Industrials	4.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. BAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 21
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. BAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMD	BAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.72	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.08	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	0.83	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	2.43	+0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMD vs. BAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the BAMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and BAMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMD	BAMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.72	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	1.03	+0.01

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. BAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than BAMB's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and BAMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	BAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-4.48%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-3.37%	-3.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-2.51%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-1.01%	-3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	1.15%	+1.50%

Volatility

BAMD vs. BAMB - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) at 1.18%. This indicates that BAMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	BAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	1.18%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.83%	2.72%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	3.90%	+6.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	4.06%	+9.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.35%	4.06%	+9.29%

BAMD vs. BAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMB's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMD vs. BAMB - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than BAMB's 2.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.95%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.56%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMD and BAMB in my portfolio?

BAMD and BAMB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMD or BAMB?

BAMD has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to BAMB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs BAMB's -4.48%.

Which ETF is better, BAMD or BAMB?

On 1-year performance, BAMD leads with 7.69% vs 2.78% for BAMB. On fees, BAMD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMD or BAMB?

Over the 1-year period, BAMD has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMD or BAMB?

BAMD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMD or BAMB?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.95% for BAMB.

What is the main difference between BAMD and BAMB?

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BAMB is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 1.09% for BAMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.