BAMBX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BAMBX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA 3 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O1) (USD). It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.97% | 4.59% | 6.61% | 6.19% | -3.23% | 5.84% | 3.34% | 8.25% | 1.51% | 9.72% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAMBX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BAMBX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 4.43%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
BAMBX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMBX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAMBX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BAMBX
FASGX
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMBX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.21 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.73 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.55 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 6.89 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMBX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.21 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.53 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.25 | 0.70 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.60 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMBX and FASGX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund | 1.95% | 1.97% | 3.86% | 4.13% | 4.70% | 2.39% | 1.09% | 3.73% | 8.70% | 3.81% | 4.82% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMBX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMBX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -47.35% | +38.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.61% | -9.07% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.66% | -23.54% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.84% | -27.20% | +18.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -7.95% | +4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -6.74% | +5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 2.04% | -1.03% |
Volatility
BAMBX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) is 1.49%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that BAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAMBX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 4.57% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.83% | 7.78% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 12.82% | -8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.56% | 12.14% | -8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 12.56% | -9.02% |