BAM vs. USFR
BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Inc.) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 3 years, BAM returned 17.90%/yr vs 4.76%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BAM vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return.
BAM
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -8.98%
- 6M
- -9.89%
- 1Y
- -14.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
BAM vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | -8.98% | -0.24% | 39.70% | 45.61% | -10.41% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM and USFR is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAM vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
BAM
USFR
BAM vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -50.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 13.37 | -12.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 202.38 | -202.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 783.80 | -784.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 15.01 | -15.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.60 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
BAM vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.37% | -1.36% | -29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -0.02% | -30.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.37% | -0.06% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.34% | 0.00% | -23.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -0.16% | -8.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.43% | 0.01% | +16.42% |
Volatility
BAM vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that BAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 0.06% | +10.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.56% | 0.18% | +22.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.82% | 0.27% | +29.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.25% | 0.40% | +29.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.25% | 0.81% | +29.44% |
Dividends
BAM vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 4.02% | 3.34% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAM and USFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAM has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAM dropped -30.37% vs USFR's -1.36%.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.01 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAM and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer