BAM vs. BEPC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC.TO).
Performance
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | -14.27% | -0.24% | 39.70% | 45.61% | -10.41% |
BEPC.TO Brookfield Renewable Corporation | 4.89% | 45.28% | 0.94% | 9.65% | -15.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
BAM is traded in USD, while BEPC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BEPC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
BAM:
$72.38B
BEPC.TO:
CA$9.96B
BAM:
$1.53
BEPC.TO:
-CA$15.60
BAM:
14.77
BEPC.TO:
2.27
BAM:
$4.90B
BEPC.TO:
CA$4.10B
BAM:
$4.64B
BEPC.TO:
CA$2.02B
BAM:
$3.04B
BEPC.TO:
CA$1.34B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than BEPC.TO's 4.89% return.
BAM
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -14.27%
- 6M
- -20.45%
- 1Y
- -5.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEPC.TO
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 48.88%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAM vs. BEPC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BAM
BEPC.TO
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAM | BEPC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | 1.47 | -1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.00 | 2.09 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 3.16 | -3.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 7.26 | -7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAM | BEPC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 1.47 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.30 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM and BEPC.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Dividend Comparison
BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than BEPC.TO's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 4.08% | 3.34% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BEPC.TO Brookfield Renewable Corporation | 3.76% | 3.97% | 4.88% | 4.82% | 4.46% | 3.26% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum BEPC.TO drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and BEPC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAM | BEPC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.37% | -57.96% | +27.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -17.39% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.80% | -13.21% | -14.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -33.87% | +25.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.59% | 7.73% | +5.86% |
Volatility
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) is 7.36%, while Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC.TO) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that BAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEPC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAM | BEPC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 9.45% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.37% | 22.37% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.28% | 33.50% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 32.93% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 34.00% | -3.77% |
Financials
BAM vs. BEPC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Brookfield Renewable Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities