PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BEPC.TO vs. FTS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BEPC.TOFTS
YTD Return15.05%11.14%
1Y Return24.32%11.38%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.24%3.41%
Sharpe Ratio0.800.80
Sortino Ratio1.411.23
Omega Ratio1.161.15
Calmar Ratio0.460.55
Martin Ratio2.263.02
Ulcer Index11.82%4.03%
Daily Std Dev33.50%15.22%
Max Drawdown-58.33%-34.36%
Current Drawdown-38.69%-5.17%

Fundamentals


BEPC.TOFTS
Market CapCA$7.47B$22.05B
EPS-CA$9.86$2.32
PEG Ratio1.092.93
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$3.18B$8.91B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$1.81B$3.72B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$1.58B$2.56B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between BEPC.TO and FTS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BEPC.TO achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than FTS's 11.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.78%
9.58%
BEPC.TO
FTS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC.TO) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEPC.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BEPC.TO, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BEPC.TO, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BEPC.TO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BEPC.TO, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BEPC.TO, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.78
FTS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FTS, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FTS, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FTS, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FTS, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FTS, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.85

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEPC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the FTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEPC.TO and FTS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.63
0.76
BEPC.TO
FTS

Dividends

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison

BEPC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than FTS's 3.92% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
BEPC.TO
Brookfield Renewable Corporation
3.58%4.50%4.52%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTS
Fortis Inc
3.92%4.11%4.18%3.40%3.54%3.31%4.01%3.41%3.72%

Drawdowns

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEPC.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -34.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPC.TO and FTS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-44.69%
-5.17%
BEPC.TO
FTS

Volatility

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.90% compared to Fortis Inc (FTS) at 4.84%. This indicates that BEPC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.90%
4.84%
BEPC.TO
FTS

Financials

BEPC.TO vs. FTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Corporation and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BEPC.TO values in CAD, FTS values in USD