BAIV vs. FIDI
BAIV (Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF) and FIDI (Fidelity International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BAIV is actively managed, while FIDI is passively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BAIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FIDI.
Performance
BAIV vs. FIDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BAIV
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FIDI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $113.82K | $399.73K | $431.56K | |
| $1.62M | $1.95M | $1.81M |
BAIV vs. FIDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF | 10.39% |
FIDI Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAIV and FIDI is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAIV vs. FIDI — Risk / Return Rank
BAIV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FIDI
BAIV vs. FIDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAIV | FIDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAIV vs. FIDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAIV drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum FIDI drawdown of -46.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIV and FIDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAIV | FIDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -46.34% | +34.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.92% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -9.63% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
BAIV vs. FIDI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAIV | FIDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 11.62% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 14.81% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 18.62% | -1.12% |
BAIV vs. FIDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDI's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAIV vs. FIDI - Dividend Comparison
BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIDI Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 3.90% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.80% | 5.09% | 4.00% | 3.36% | 4.26% | 4.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAIV and FIDI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FIDI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FIDI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BAIV.
FIDI has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.
They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BAIV and 0.39% for FIDI.
Find the right allocation for BAIV and FIDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer