BAI vs. ARMH
BAI (iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
BAI vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BAI
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- 55.29%
- 6M
- 51.89%
- 1Y
- 97.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAI vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | 3.09% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAI and ARMH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAI vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
BAI
ARMH
BAI vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 471,500.14 | -471,498.45 |
Drawdowns
BAI vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAI drawdown since its inception was -34.09%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAI and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.09% | -1.61% | -32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | 0.00% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -0.40% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | — | — |
Volatility
BAI vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.43% | 113.00% | -80.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 113.00% | -77.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 113.00% | -77.94% |
BAI vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAI vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
BAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | 1.16% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAI and ARMH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BAI.
BAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BAI and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for BAI and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer