PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAI vs. TCAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAI vs. TCAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAI achieves a 62.85% return, which is significantly lower than TCAI's 96.33% return.


BAI

1D
1.94%
1M
13.43%
YTD
62.85%
6M
60.92%
1Y
104.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAI

1D
2.42%
1M
16.16%
YTD
96.33%
6M
93.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAI vs. TCAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAI and TCAI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025

0.85

BAI vs. TCAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BAI
TCAI

Technology

88.8%
51.4%

Industrials

4.6%
25.4%

Communication Services

3.9%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
1.3%

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

7.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

8.6%

Technology

BAI
88.8%
TCAI
51.4%

Industrials

BAI
4.6%
TCAI
25.4%

Communication Services

BAI
3.9%
TCAI
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BAI
2.6%
TCAI
1.3%

Healthcare

BAI
0.7%
TCAI

-

Basic Materials

BAI

-

TCAI

-

Consumer Defensive

BAI

-

TCAI

-

Energy

BAI

-

TCAI
4.7%

Financial Services

BAI

-

TCAI
7.1%

Real Estate

BAI

-

TCAI
0.6%

Utilities

BAI

-

TCAI
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAI vs. TCAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAI
BAI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAI vs. TCAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAITCAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.20

BAI vs. TCAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAI vs. TCAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAI drawdown since its inception was -34.09%, which is greater than TCAI's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAI and TCAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAITCAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.09%

-15.80%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-3.53%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

Volatility

BAI vs. TCAI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAITCAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.45%

37.24%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

37.24%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.90%

37.24%

-0.34%

BAI vs. TCAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TCAI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAI vs. TCAI - Dividend Comparison

BAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than TCAI's 0.03% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAI and TCAI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BAI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BAI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TCAI.

BAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.03% for TCAI.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BAI and 0.65% for TCAI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAI and TCAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer