BAFE vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BAFE (Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BAFE is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAFE charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

BAFE vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFE achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 9.76% return.

BAFE

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 4.99%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFE vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF	5.32%	0.61%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	9.76%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFE and GXLC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

BAFE vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFE

BAFE Risk / Return Rank: 29
BAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFE vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAFE	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.01	—	—

Drawdowns

BAFE vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFE drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFE and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAFE	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.37%	-9.08%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-1.76%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-1.53%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAFE	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.44%	13.79%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.51%	13.79%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	13.79%	+3.72%

BAFE vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAFE vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

BAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than GXLC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF	0.28%	0.30%	0.06%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAFE and GXLC in my portfolio?

BAFE and GXLC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAFE or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAFE or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BAFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAFE or GXLC?

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.28% for BAFE.

What is the main difference between BAFE and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BAFE and 0.02% for GXLC.