PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFE vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFE vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFE achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.78% return.


BAFE

1D
0.61%
1M
2.46%
6M
4.64%
YTD
7.73%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.88%
6M
4.29%
YTD
4.78%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFE vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAFE and BUFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.83

The correlation between BAFE and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFE vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFE
BAFE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFE vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAFEBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.53

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

3.36

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

19.76

-16.57

BAFE vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFE and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAFE vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFE drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFE and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFEBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-2.87%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-2.87%

-9.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-0.24%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

0.49%

+3.08%

Volatility

BAFE vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 1.07%. This indicates that BAFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFEBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

1.07%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

3.40%

+7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

4.02%

+9.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

3.98%

+13.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

3.98%

+13.36%

BAFE vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFE vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

BAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BAFE
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
0.28%0.30%0.06%
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFE and BUFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAFE has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to BUFX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAFE dropped -18.37% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

On 1-year performance, BAFE leads with 12.03% vs 9.65% for BUFX. On fees, BAFE is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAFE has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAFE is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

BAFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

BAFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BAFE and 0.96% for BUFX.

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFE and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer