PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 180.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 18.72%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 67.37% annualized return.


BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
3.73%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
-1.39%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%

STRL

1D
2.44%
1M
1.20%
YTD
180.50%
6M
172.57%
1Y
323.17%
3Y*
152.83%
5Y*
104.12%
10Y*
67.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAESY vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
180.50%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-33.11%92.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and STRL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$77.52B

STRL:

$26.66B

EPS

BAESY:

£5.29

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

BAESY:

14.41

STRL:

76.77

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

2.65

STRL:

1.63

PS Ratio

BAESY:

1.06

STRL:

9.22

PB Ratio

BAESY:

4.92

STRL:

22.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

£54.56B

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

£19.72B

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

£7.74B

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYSTRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.54

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

10.41

-10.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

28.52

-28.48

BAESY vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYSTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-92.51%

+33.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-31.02%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-47.67%

+24.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-47.67%

+24.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-59.60%

+17.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-13.56%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-46.29%

+26.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.17%

11.30%

-1.13%

Volatility

BAESY vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) is 10.68%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 27.60%. This indicates that BAESY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYSTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

27.60%

-16.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

65.26%

-40.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

82.41%

-50.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.12%

57.29%

-29.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

53.58%

-25.68%

Dividends

BAESY vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAESY vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
14.67B
825.68M
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAESY values in GBP, STRL values in USD

BAESY vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems PLC and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%202120222023202420252026
9.2%
23.5%
Portfolio components
BAESY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

BAESY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

BAESY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and STRL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to BAESY (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAESY dropped -59.20% vs STRL's -92.51%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer