PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. ATO.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Atos SE (ATO.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAESY is traded in USD, while ATO.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ATO.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than ATO.PA's -31.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has outperformed ATO.PA with an annualized return of 18.72%, while ATO.PA has yielded a comparatively lower -38.00% annualized return.


BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%

ATO.PA

1D
2.43%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
-31.93%
6M
-38.17%
1Y
-11.18%
3Y*
-66.90%
5Y*
-61.75%
10Y*
-38.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%
ATO.PA
Atos SE
-31.93%118.88%-95.34%-19.30%-77.35%-53.41%9.53%37.33%-43.84%38.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and ATO.PA is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.22

The correlation between BAESY and ATO.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. ATO.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ATO.PA
ATO.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ATO.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Atos SE (ATO.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYATO.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.02

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

-0.23

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

-0.42

+0.46

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the ATO.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and ATO.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum ATO.PA drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and ATO.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYATO.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-99.86%

+40.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-47.80%

+24.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-99.00%

+75.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-99.75%

+76.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-99.86%

+57.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-99.55%

+82.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-40.06%

+20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.17%

26.39%

-16.22%

Volatility

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) is 10.68%, while Atos SE (ATO.PA) has a volatility of 15.93%. This indicates that BAESY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATO.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYATO.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

15.93%

-5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

43.23%

-18.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

60.68%

-28.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.12%

127.66%

-99.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

93.35%

-65.45%

Dividends

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while ATO.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATO.PA
Atos SE
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%

Financials

BAESY vs. ATO.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Atos SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BAESY values in GBP, ATO.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and ATO.PA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and ATO.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer