PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAC vs. UPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAC vs. UPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than UPS's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed UPS with an annualized return of 18.19%, while UPS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


BAC

1D
2.31%
1M
13.98%
YTD
3.72%
6M
3.46%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
18.19%

UPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
11.11%
YTD
12.37%
6M
10.44%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
-9.66%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAC vs. UPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
3.72%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
12.37%-15.93%-15.93%-5.96%-16.21%30.02%48.64%24.24%-15.48%7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BAC and UPS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 1999

0.44

The correlation between BAC and UPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAC:

$415.53B

UPS:

$91.89B

EPS

BAC:

$4.19

UPS:

$6.18

PE Ratio

BAC:

13.36

UPS:

17.49

PS Ratio

BAC:

2.42

UPS:

1.04

PB Ratio

BAC:

1.51

UPS:

5.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAC:

$174.85B

UPS:

$88.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAC:

$110.47B

UPS:

$16.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAC:

$41.74B

UPS:

$10.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAC vs. UPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

UPS
UPS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAC vs. UPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BACUPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

0.72

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

1.22

+3.00

BAC vs. UPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the UPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and UPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAC vs. UPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than UPS's maximum drawdown of -57.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and UPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACUPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.10%

-57.92%

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-20.28%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-50.71%

+23.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.64%

-57.92%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.95%

-57.92%

+8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-42.22%

+41.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.30%

-15.33%

-12.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.96%

11.93%

-4.97%

Volatility

BAC vs. UPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.49%, while United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACUPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

9.06%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

21.69%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

29.72%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.89%

28.46%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.68%

27.61%

+3.07%

Dividends

BAC vs. UPS - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than UPS's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.72%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
6.07%6.61%5.17%4.12%3.50%1.90%2.40%3.28%3.73%2.79%2.72%3.03%

Financials

BAC vs. UPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and United Parcel Service, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
30.27B
21.20B
(BAC) Total Revenue
(UPS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAC vs. UPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank of America Corporation and United Parcel Service, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.6%
17.0%
Portfolio components
BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.

UPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.

UPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.

UPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 864.00M and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAC and UPS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPS has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs UPS's -57.92%.

BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAC and UPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer