PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABX vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABX vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BABX vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-31.52%123.85%-7.31%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -31.52% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -35.84% return.


BABX

1D
5.70%
1M
-25.93%
YTD
-31.52%
6M
-56.68%
1Y
-30.71%
3Y*
-5.38%
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BABX vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BABX vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABXTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.33

0.32

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.09

1.26

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.15

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

0.59

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.98

1.27

-2.25

BABX vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABXTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

0.32

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.44

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and TSLG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BABX vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%.


Drawdowns

BABX vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BABXTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.62%

-82.86%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.43%

-50.92%

-12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.35%

-67.59%

+6.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.56%

-58.04%

+13.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.47%

23.82%

+7.65%

Volatility

BABX vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 25.50% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) at 22.28%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BABXTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.50%

22.28%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

59.35%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.17%

110.61%

-18.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.96%

119.00%

-36.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.96%

119.00%

-36.04%