BABX vs. TSDD
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BABX returned -16.91% vs -62.72% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
BABX vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -48.20% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -2.07% return.
BABX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- 6M
- -59.30%
- YTD
- -48.20%
- 1Y
- -16.91%
- 3Y*
- -8.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -62.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -48.20% | 123.85% | 1.23% | -24.04% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -2.07% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and TSDD is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.27 |
BABX vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BABX
TSDD
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BABX
TSDD
Basic Materials
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Communication Services
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Consumer Defensive
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Energy
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Financial Services
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Healthcare
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Industrials
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Real Estate
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Technology
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Utilities
BABX
-
TSDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
TSDD
BABX vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABX | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.90 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.90 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | -1.15 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABX vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.83% | -99.03% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.83% | -69.48% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.76% | -98.88% | +28.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -72.14% | +26.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.18% | 54.77% | -11.59% |
Volatility
BABX vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is 26.72%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 34.42%. This indicates that BABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.72% | 34.42% | -7.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.20% | 62.90% | -2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.15% | 89.44% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.34% | 114.59% | -31.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.34% | 114.59% | -31.25% |
BABX vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABX vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.60% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and TSDD have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (34.42%) compared to BABX (26.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -16.91% vs -62.72% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BABX has been the lower-risk option at 26.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -16.91% return vs -62.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.60%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
BABX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 0.95% for TSDD.
BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABX and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer