BABX vs. SMCY
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and SMCY (YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SMCY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BABX returned -16.91% vs -43.46% for SMCY. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SMCY.
Performance
BABX vs. SMCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -48.20% return, which is significantly lower than SMCY's -9.97% return.
BABX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- 6M
- -59.30%
- YTD
- -48.20%
- 1Y
- -16.91%
- 3Y*
- -8.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCY
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.97%
- 1Y
- -43.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX vs. SMCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -48.20% | 123.85% | -7.68% |
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | -9.97% | -15.41% | -33.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and SMCY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. SMCY — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
SMCY
BABX vs. SMCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABX | SMCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.92 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.72 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | -1.14 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABX vs. SMCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, which is greater than SMCY's maximum drawdown of -64.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and SMCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | SMCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.83% | -64.75% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.83% | -60.43% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.76% | -56.59% | -14.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -37.85% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.18% | 38.15% | +5.03% |
Volatility
BABX vs. SMCY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 26.72% compared to YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) at 21.39%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | SMCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.72% | 21.39% | +5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.20% | 68.08% | -7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.15% | 72.59% | +17.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.34% | 80.02% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.34% | 80.02% | +3.32% |
BABX vs. SMCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABX vs. SMCY - Dividend Comparison
BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 205.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | 205.51% | 231.43% | 38.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and SMCY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABX has higher volatility (26.72%) compared to SMCY (21.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs SMCY's -64.75%.
On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -16.91% vs -43.46% for SMCY. On fees, SMCY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SMCY has been the lower-risk option at 21.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -16.91% return vs -43.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 205.51%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
BABX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMCY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 1.01% for SMCY.
BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABX and SMCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer