BABX vs. NTSD
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
BABX vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BABX
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -37.51%
- YTD
- -55.91%
- 6M
- -58.68%
- 1Y
- -36.03%
- 3Y*
- -7.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -44.85% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and NTSD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BABX vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABX vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -75.11%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.11% | -5.58% | -69.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.11% | -2.97% | -72.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.58% | -1.09% | -44.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.45% | — | — |
Volatility
BABX vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.73% | 25.11% | +62.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.85% | 25.11% | +57.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.85% | 25.11% | +57.74% |
BABX vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABX vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BABX nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and NTSD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
BABX and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for BABX and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer