BABU vs. TMF
BABU (Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
BABU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BABU
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -11.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -11.63%
- 1Y
- 0.90%
- 3Y*
- -20.78%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- -16.56%
BABU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | -44.84% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -8.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABU and TMF is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
BABU
TMF
BABU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.05 | -0.14 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
BABU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABU drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABU and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -92.89% | +43.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -92.23% | +47.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | -43.63% | +8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.49% | — |
Volatility
BABU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.22% | 28.76% | +53.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.22% | 46.75% | +35.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.22% | 43.92% | +38.30% |
BABU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
BABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than TMF's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.15% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABU and TMF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BABU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.36% for BABU.
BABU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. BABU tracks Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BABU and 1.01% for TMF.
Find the right allocation for BABU and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer