BABI.L vs. AMDI.L
BABI.L (IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP) and AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BABI.L returned -24.89% vs 141.43% for AMDI.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABI.L achieves a -28.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMDI.L's 116.03% return.
BABI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -35.35%
- YTD
- -28.38%
- 1Y
- -24.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 109.68%
- YTD
- 116.03%
- 1Y
- 141.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | -28.38% | 10,934.08% |
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 116.03% | 12,701.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABI.L and AMDI.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
BABI.L
AMDI.L
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABI.L | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.99 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 5.10 | -5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than AMDI.L's maximum drawdown of -47.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and AMDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABI.L | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -47.34% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.96% | -47.34% | -12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.55% | -1.23% | -53.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -21.07% | -7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.92% | 27.75% | +7.17% |
Volatility
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) is 11.84%, while IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a volatility of 23.14%. This indicates that BABI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABI.L | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 23.14% | -11.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 45.81% | -19.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.55% | 74.61% | -19.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,398.92% | 9,806.47% | -407.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,398.92% | 9,806.47% | -407.55% |
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BABI.L and AMDI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
BABI.L vs. AMDI.L - Dividend Comparison
BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.17%, more than AMDI.L's 44.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 44.56% | 8.85% |
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | 65.17% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABI.L and AMDI.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABI.L and AMDI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for BABI.L and AMDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer