AMDI.L vs. AMDL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL).

AMDI.L and AMDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025. AMDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.

Performance

AMDI.L vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDI.L vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP	-21.20%	13.02%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	-21.48%	82.73%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMDI.L having a -21.20% return and AMDL slightly lower at -21.48%.

AMDI.L

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: -21.20%
• 6M: -21.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 7.48%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -21.48%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 137.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDI.L vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

AMDL

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

AMDI.L

IncomeShares AMD Options ETP

Return for Risk

AMDI.L vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 72
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDI.L vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDI.L	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	-0.27	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between AMDI.L and AMDL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMDI.L vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP	0.38%	0.09%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMDI.L vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -45.70%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDI.L	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.70%	-88.63%	+42.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.50%	-52.14%	+9.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.66%	-51.71%	+33.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDI.L	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	32.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	97.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.98%	129.18%	-78.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.98%	111.42%	-60.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.98%	111.42%	-60.44%