BABA vs. WFC
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) are both stocks. BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while WFC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.42%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for WFC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than WFC's -9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed WFC with an annualized return of 4.42%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.95% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -21.91%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- -2.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
WFC
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 13.87%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 28.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
BABA vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -9.20% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and WFC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
BABA:
$272.45B
WFC:
$269.39B
BABA:
CN¥33.90
WFC:
$6.73
BABA:
22.55
WFC:
12.44
BABA:
1.01
WFC:
1.07
BABA:
2.26
WFC:
2.15
BABA:
1.75
WFC:
1.65
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
WFC:
$125.70B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
WFC:
$81.14B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
WFC:
$31.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
WFC
BABA vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.12 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 0.68 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 1.54 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, roughly equal to the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and WFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -79.01% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -23.02% | -16.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -24.73% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -37.10% | -35.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -64.46% | -15.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -12.21% | -49.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -15.35% | -22.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 10.18% | +9.40% |
Volatility
BABA vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) at 5.95%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 5.95% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 19.95% | +9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 26.75% | +17.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 30.23% | +21.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 32.28% | +11.12% |
Dividends
BABA vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than WFC's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.15% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
BABA vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. WFC - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
WFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
WFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
WFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and WFC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to WFC (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs WFC's -79.01%.
WFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and WFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer