PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 4.42%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.02% annualized return.


BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-21.91%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
-2.37%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%

VTI

1D
0.57%
1M
0.45%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.69%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.62%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and VTI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABAVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.35

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

2.79

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

12.52

-12.64

BABA vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABAVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

-55.45%

-24.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-8.92%

-31.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

-19.30%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

-25.36%

-47.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

-35.00%

-45.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.20%

-2.14%

-60.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

-8.02%

-29.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.58%

1.99%

+17.59%

Volatility

BABA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.50%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABAVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

4.50%

+5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

9.82%

+19.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

12.64%

+31.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

17.47%

+33.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.40%

18.33%

+25.07%

Dividends

BABA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VTI's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.93%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and VTI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer