BABA vs. LI
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and LI (Li Auto Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BABA in Internet Retail, LI in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, BABA returned -10.74%/yr vs -12.64%/yr for LI. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. LI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than LI's -15.53% return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
LI
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -22.74%
- YTD
- -15.53%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -48.49%
- 3Y*
- -23.14%
- 5Y*
- -12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BABA vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | -7.81% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | -15.53% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and LI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between BABA and LI shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BABA:
$272.45B
LI:
$14.50B
BABA:
CN¥33.90
LI:
-CN¥1.74
BABA:
2.26
LI:
0.92
BABA:
1.75
LI:
1.41
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
LI:
CN¥108.98B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
LI:
CN¥17.42B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
LI:
-CN¥2.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
LI
BABA vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.78 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | -0.89 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | -1.35 | +1.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than LI's maximum drawdown of -70.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and LI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -70.65% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -56.95% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -70.65% | +30.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -70.65% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -69.35% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -39.93% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 37.41% | -17.83% |
Volatility
BABA vs. LI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 15.12% | -5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 28.81% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 40.30% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 63.52% | -12.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 68.32% | -24.92% |
Dividends
BABA vs. LI - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while LI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. LI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. LI - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and LI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs LI's -70.65%.
BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and LI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer