BAAPX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A (BAAPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BAAPX is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 21, 2006. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A | -4.98% | 17.96% | 5.20% | 18.82% | -16.39% | 14.52% | 19.10% | 24.24% | -7.93% | 17.03% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAAPX achieves a -4.98% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BAAPX having a 8.67% annualized return and FASGX not far ahead at 8.70%.
BAAPX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 14.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAAPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BAAPX
FASGX
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A (BAAPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAAPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.21 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.73 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.55 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 6.89 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAAPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.21 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.53 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.70 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.60 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAAPX and FASGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A | 6.13% | 5.82% | 0.00% | 4.06% | 2.00% | 5.86% | 1.83% | 2.23% | 5.98% | 2.84% | 1.49% | 13.83% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAAPX drawdown since its inception was -53.61%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAAPX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAAPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.61% | -47.35% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -9.07% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -23.54% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.15% | -27.20% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -7.95% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -6.74% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.04% | +0.21% |
Volatility
BAAPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A (BAAPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAAPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.57% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 7.78% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 12.82% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 12.14% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 12.56% | +1.36% |