PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA.L vs. NOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA.L vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BA.L is traded in GBp, while NOC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NOC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA.L achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly higher than NOC's -2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BA.L has outperformed NOC with an annualized return of 18.87%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.


BA.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
3.27%
YTD
12.71%
6M
13.60%
1Y
0.36%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
32.37%
10Y*
18.87%

NOC

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.73%
YTD
-2.25%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA.L vs. NOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
12.71%52.12%5.88%33.31%60.92%17.57%-9.28%28.43%-16.75%0.30%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-2.25%14.81%3.71%-17.15%60.02%30.52%-12.57%37.26%-14.15%22.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BA.L and NOC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007

0.26

The correlation between BA.L and NOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (10 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BA.L:

£57.97B

NOC:

$78.42B

EPS

BA.L:

£1.33

NOC:

$31.95

PE Ratio

BA.L:

14.41

NOC:

17.22

PEG Ratio

BA.L:

2.30

NOC:

2.54

PS Ratio

BA.L:

1.06

NOC:

1.86

PB Ratio

BA.L:

4.92

NOC:

4.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA.L:

£54.65B

NOC:

$42.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA.L:

£4.75B

NOC:

$8.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

BA.L:

£7.55B

NOC:

$7.50B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA.L vs. NOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA.L
BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA.L vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BA.LNOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.12

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.46

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

1.16

-0.83

BA.L vs. NOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA.L and NOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BA.L vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA.L drawdown since its inception was -43.67%, roughly equal to the maximum NOC drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA.L and NOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BA.LNOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.67%

-43.57%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.30%

-31.28%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.30%

-31.28%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-31.28%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

-31.28%

-6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.12%

-28.03%

+10.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-10.30%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.84%

12.29%

-2.45%

Volatility

BA.L vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 6.93%. This indicates that BA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BA.LNOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.48%

6.93%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.43%

21.43%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.85%

27.06%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

26.06%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

26.64%

-1.57%

Dividends

BA.L vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than NOC's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
1.90%1.99%2.69%2.53%2.99%4.40%4.75%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.71%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%

Financials

BA.L vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems plc and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B13.00B14.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
14.77B
9.88B
(BA.L) Total Revenue
(NOC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BA.L values in GBP, NOC values in USD

BA.L vs. NOC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems plc and Northrop Grumman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%202120222023202420252026
9.2%
19.8%
Portfolio components
BA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.96B and revenue of 9.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

BA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 989.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

BA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 875.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BA.L and NOC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA.L and NOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer