PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
B vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

B vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, B achieves a -6.52% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, B has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 9.32%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 25.74% annualized return.


B

1D
2.81%
1M
-10.03%
YTD
-6.52%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
96.46%
3Y*
36.83%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
9.32%

CCJ

1D
2.01%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.35%
1Y
52.94%
3Y*
47.60%
5Y*
36.72%
10Y*
25.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
-6.52%186.91%-12.29%7.86%-6.81%-14.75%24.60%38.45%-5.01%-8.80%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
10.35%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between B and CCJ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 1996

0.28

The correlation between B and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (10 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

B:

$67.34B

CCJ:

$43.98B

EPS

B:

$3.59

CCJ:

CA$1.49

PE Ratio

B:

11.18

CCJ:

94.45

PEG Ratio

B:

1.13

CCJ:

0.79

PS Ratio

B:

3.59

CCJ:

17.37

PB Ratio

B:

2.45

CCJ:

8.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

B:

$19.00B

CCJ:

CA$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

B:

$10.32B

CCJ:

CA$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

B:

$12.63B

CCJ:

CA$996.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

B vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B
B Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
B Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
B Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
B Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCCJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.83

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

4.43

+3.52

B vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

B vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.51%

-87.53%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.31%

-29.13%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.31%

-40.01%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.96%

-40.01%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.13%

-57.22%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.16%

-24.71%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-46.07%

+8.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

11.99%

+0.19%

Volatility

B vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barrick Mining Corporation (B) is 15.80%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that B experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.80%

17.90%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.19%

39.91%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.31%

55.17%

-9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.25%

50.01%

-13.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.85%

46.75%

-9.90%

Dividends

B vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than CCJ's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
2.29%1.21%2.58%2.21%3.20%2.47%1.82%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.17%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%

Financials

B vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Mining Corporation and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.18B
847.55M
(B) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. B values in USD, CCJ values in CAD

B vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barrick Mining Corporation and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
34.3%
Portfolio components
B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 2.94B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


B and CCJ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCJ has higher volatility (17.90%) compared to B (15.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, B dropped -88.51% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for B and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer