AZTD vs. POW
AZTD (Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AZTD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. AZTD is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
AZTD vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZTD achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 40.86% return.
AZTD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 23.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -11.33%
- 6M
- 33.29%
- YTD
- 40.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AZTD vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF | 14.80% | 0.25% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 40.86% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZTD and POW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZTD vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
AZTD
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AZTD vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZTD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZTD vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZTD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -18.37% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -17.23% | +14.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -4.47% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility
AZTD vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZTD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 32.83% | -15.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 32.83% | -14.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 32.83% | -14.33% |
AZTD vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AZTD and POW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
AZTD vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF | 0.92% | 1.05% | 1.87% | 0.12% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZTD and POW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AZTD and POW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
AZTD has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
AZTD is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and VistaShares.
Find the right allocation for AZTD and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer