PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZTD vs. NRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZTD vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZTD achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 33.90% return.


AZTD

1D
1.35%
1M
-1.93%
6M
7.77%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
18.26%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.76%

NRSH

1D
4.39%
1M
-10.06%
6M
21.03%
YTD
33.90%
1Y
44.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$206.38K$100.43K$37.33K
$195.90K$107.25K$73.84K

AZTD vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
14.50%25.46%6.87%4.98%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
33.90%12.95%-6.17%9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTD and NRSH is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.70

The correlation between AZTD and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

AZTD vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AZTD
NRSH

Industrials

22.7%
41.1%

Financial Services

21.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

19.8%

-

Technology

14.3%
56.1%

Healthcare

9.7%

-

Communication Services

3.3%

-

Energy

2.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Industrials

AZTD
22.7%
NRSH
41.1%

Financial Services

AZTD
21.5%
NRSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

AZTD
19.8%
NRSH

-

Technology

AZTD
14.3%
NRSH
56.1%

Healthcare

AZTD
9.7%
NRSH

-

Communication Services

AZTD
3.3%
NRSH

-

Energy

AZTD
2.5%
NRSH
2.5%

Basic Materials

AZTD
2.2%
NRSH

-

Utilities

AZTD
1.9%
NRSH

-

Consumer Defensive

AZTD
1.6%
NRSH

-

Real Estate

AZTD

-

NRSH
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZTD vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AZTD
AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AZTD vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZTDNRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.23

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.24

11.26

-6.02

AZTD vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTD and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and NRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZTDNRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-24.01%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-13.84%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-10.06%

+7.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-5.57%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.96%

-0.46%

Volatility

AZTD vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) is 3.92%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that AZTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZTDNRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

9.28%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

23.21%

-9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

27.56%

-10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

22.52%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

22.52%

-4.08%

AZTD vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AZTD and NRSH have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

AZTD vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than NRSH's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
0.92%1.05%1.87%0.12%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.31%0.42%0.90%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZTD and NRSH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRSH has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to AZTD (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 44.45% vs 18.26% for AZTD. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, AZTD has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 44.45% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AZTD and NRSH have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

AZTD has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.31% for NRSH.

AZTD is categorized as Global Equities, while NRSH is Large Cap Blend Equities. AZTD tracks Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return.

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZTD and NRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer