AZO vs. EZPW
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) and EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) are both stocks. AZO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, AZO returned 15.33%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for EZPW. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZO vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 60.92% return. Over the past 10 years, AZO has underperformed EZPW with an annualized return of 15.33%, while EZPW has yielded a comparatively higher 17.29% annualized return.
AZO
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- -8.11%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- -15.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
EZPW
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 60.92%
- 6M
- 48.95%
- 1Y
- 133.04%
- 3Y*
- 53.03%
- 5Y*
- 34.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.29%
AZO vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -8.11% | 5.92% | 23.84% | 4.84% | 17.64% | 76.84% | -0.49% | 42.10% | 17.85% | -9.93% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 60.92% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZO and EZPW is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 1991 | 0.12 |
The correlation between AZO and EZPW shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AZO:
$52.52B
EZPW:
$2.61B
AZO:
$145.27
EZPW:
$1.76
AZO:
21.45
EZPW:
17.74
AZO:
1.86
EZPW:
0.12
AZO:
2.66
EZPW:
1.76
AZO:
$19.99B
EZPW:
$1.48B
AZO:
$10.34B
EZPW:
$865.21M
AZO:
$4.26B
EZPW:
$256.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZO vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank
AZO
EZPW
AZO vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZO | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.58 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 8.27 | -8.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 31.38 | -32.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZO vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and EZPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZO | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -97.28% | +50.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.59% | -16.19% | -16.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.59% | -20.51% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -35.94% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.14% | -76.59% | +34.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.44% | -17.91% | -10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -59.10% | +48.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.50% | 4.26% | +11.24% |
Volatility
AZO vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is 11.64%, while EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that AZO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZO | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 15.70% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 27.43% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.23% | 35.11% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 34.25% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 39.36% | -12.88% |
Dividends
AZO vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison
Neither AZO nor EZPW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AZO vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AZO vs. EZPW - Profitability Comparison
AZO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
AZO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
AZO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AZO and EZPW have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPW has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to AZO (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs EZPW's -97.28%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZO and EZPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer